<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: U.N. Carbon Credits Called Bogus</title>
	<atom:link href="http://earth2tech.com/2007/11/30/un-carbon-credits-called-bogus/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://earth2tech.com/2007/11/30/un-carbon-credits-called-bogus/</link>
	<description>Helping the Earth with Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 21:25:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: San Francisco Airport to Offer Carbon Offsets &#124; Eco Friendly Mag</title>
		<link>http://earth2tech.com/2007/11/30/un-carbon-credits-called-bogus/#comment-22864</link>
		<dc:creator>San Francisco Airport to Offer Carbon Offsets &#124; Eco Friendly Mag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 09:51:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/2007/11/30/un-carbon-credits-called-bogus/#comment-22864</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] the project could prove controversial. The worth of carbon offset programs is a topic of heavy debate, as critics question whether such projects are viable, or would have happened with or without the [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the project could prove controversial. The worth of carbon offset programs is a topic of heavy debate, as critics question whether such projects are viable, or would have happened with or without the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: San Francisco Airport to Offer Carbon Offsets &#124; Alternative Energy News</title>
		<link>http://earth2tech.com/2007/11/30/un-carbon-credits-called-bogus/#comment-22855</link>
		<dc:creator>San Francisco Airport to Offer Carbon Offsets &#124; Alternative Energy News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 03:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/2007/11/30/un-carbon-credits-called-bogus/#comment-22855</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] the project could prove controversial. The worth of carbon offset programs is a topic of heavy debate, as critics question whether such projects are viable, or would have happened with or without the [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the project could prove controversial. The worth of carbon offset programs is a topic of heavy debate, as critics question whether such projects are viable, or would have happened with or without the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: San Francisco Airport to Offer Carbon Offsets</title>
		<link>http://earth2tech.com/2007/11/30/un-carbon-credits-called-bogus/#comment-22829</link>
		<dc:creator>San Francisco Airport to Offer Carbon Offsets</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2008 03:10:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/2007/11/30/un-carbon-credits-called-bogus/#comment-22829</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] the project could prove controversial. The worth of carbon offset programs is a topic of heavy debate, as critics question whether such projects are viable, or would have happened with or without the [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the project could prove controversial. The worth of carbon offset programs is a topic of heavy debate, as critics question whether such projects are viable, or would have happened with or without the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: San Francisco Airport to Offer Carbon Offsets &#171; Earth2Tech</title>
		<link>http://earth2tech.com/2007/11/30/un-carbon-credits-called-bogus/#comment-22814</link>
		<dc:creator>San Francisco Airport to Offer Carbon Offsets &#171; Earth2Tech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 20:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/2007/11/30/un-carbon-credits-called-bogus/#comment-22814</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] the project could prove controversial. The worth of carbon offset programs is a topic of heavy debate, as critics question whether such projects are viable, or would have happened with or without the [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the project could prove controversial. The worth of carbon offset programs is a topic of heavy debate, as critics question whether such projects are viable, or would have happened with or without the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carbon Market Software Startup Ramps Up Funding &#171; Earth2Tech</title>
		<link>http://earth2tech.com/2007/11/30/un-carbon-credits-called-bogus/#comment-20345</link>
		<dc:creator>Carbon Market Software Startup Ramps Up Funding &#171; Earth2Tech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 18:17:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/2007/11/30/un-carbon-credits-called-bogus/#comment-20345</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] question whether carbon offsets projects are actually facilitating new carbon abatement, and the World Wildlife Fund released a report last year calling 20 percent of the UN’s certified emissions reduction credits, as [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] question whether carbon offsets projects are actually facilitating new carbon abatement, and the World Wildlife Fund released a report last year calling 20 percent of the UN’s certified emissions reduction credits, as [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UN Offsets Might Not Be Offsetting Much &#171; Earth2Tech</title>
		<link>http://earth2tech.com/2007/11/30/un-carbon-credits-called-bogus/#comment-11855</link>
		<dc:creator>UN Offsets Might Not Be Offsetting Much &#171; Earth2Tech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 19:25:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/2007/11/30/un-carbon-credits-called-bogus/#comment-11855</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] is the same issue the World Wildlife Foundation raised months when they released a report calling alleging 20 percent of the CDM offsets are [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is the same issue the World Wildlife Foundation raised months when they released a report calling alleging 20 percent of the CDM offsets are [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: james bogin</title>
		<link>http://earth2tech.com/2007/11/30/un-carbon-credits-called-bogus/#comment-9453</link>
		<dc:creator>james bogin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 17:18:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/2007/11/30/un-carbon-credits-called-bogus/#comment-9453</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Duh, what can you expect from the likes of Al Gore&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Duh, what can you expect from the likes of Al Gore</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Dixon</title>
		<link>http://earth2tech.com/2007/11/30/un-carbon-credits-called-bogus/#comment-9447</link>
		<dc:creator>James Dixon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 15:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/2007/11/30/un-carbon-credits-called-bogus/#comment-9447</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Looks like Al Gore has created a new way to make money for some, at the expense of most of us.  What in hell is this about?  You can pollute all you want, and pay for it?  Well that makes sense to the rich, and the corporations I suppose.  I see it working into a new tax, just for being alive on the planet.  Who will the beneficiaries be?  Certainly not the general population.  Be afraid, very afraid.  This is just a scam, and will eventually be a religion if Al Gore has his way.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like Al Gore has created a new way to make money for some, at the expense of most of us.  What in hell is this about?  You can pollute all you want, and pay for it?  Well that makes sense to the rich, and the corporations I suppose.  I see it working into a new tax, just for being alive on the planet.  Who will the beneficiaries be?  Certainly not the general population.  Be afraid, very afraid.  This is just a scam, and will eventually be a religion if Al Gore has his way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The House Duped by Carbon Offsets? &#171; Earth2Tech</title>
		<link>http://earth2tech.com/2007/11/30/un-carbon-credits-called-bogus/#comment-8503</link>
		<dc:creator>The House Duped by Carbon Offsets? &#171; Earth2Tech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 13:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/2007/11/30/un-carbon-credits-called-bogus/#comment-8503</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] carbon market as well. Around the same time Congress was purchasing these offsets, the World Wildlife Fund released a report denouncing 20 percent of the UN&#8217;s certified emissions reduction credits, as facilitated [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] carbon market as well. Around the same time Congress was purchasing these offsets, the World Wildlife Fund released a report denouncing 20 percent of the UN&#8217;s certified emissions reduction credits, as facilitated [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: F.T.C. Investigates Greenwashing &#171; Earth2Tech</title>
		<link>http://earth2tech.com/2007/11/30/un-carbon-credits-called-bogus/#comment-7474</link>
		<dc:creator>F.T.C. Investigates Greenwashing &#171; Earth2Tech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 05:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/2007/11/30/un-carbon-credits-called-bogus/#comment-7474</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] problem led the World Wildlife Fund to accuse a full fifth of all U.N. carbon credits to be bogus. Hopefully the F.T.C. will offer verification solutions and provide a body of standards that could [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] problem led the World Wildlife Fund to accuse a full fifth of all U.N. carbon credits to be bogus. Hopefully the F.T.C. will offer verification solutions and provide a body of standards that could [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew T. Fielding</title>
		<link>http://earth2tech.com/2007/11/30/un-carbon-credits-called-bogus/#comment-5548</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew T. Fielding</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 20:50:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/2007/11/30/un-carbon-credits-called-bogus/#comment-5548</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The actual problem with the Carbon Market to date lies in the inability to properly design the underlying C&amp;T.  As for integrity of most Offset Projects (CDM/JI) - the real problem is not the integrity of the actual reductions - the problem is in the CDM Executive Board.  Its constant revision, non scientific analysis, and a general disregard for commercial markets has rewarded non sustainable projects and destroyed other, more sustainable projects. I can only hope that the US follows CCAR&#039;s lead in Project Offset Standards.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The actual problem with the Carbon Market to date lies in the inability to properly design the underlying C&amp;T.  As for integrity of most Offset Projects (CDM/JI) &#8211; the real problem is not the integrity of the actual reductions &#8211; the problem is in the CDM Executive Board.  Its constant revision, non scientific analysis, and a general disregard for commercial markets has rewarded non sustainable projects and destroyed other, more sustainable projects. I can only hope that the US follows CCAR&#8217;s lead in Project Offset Standards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerry</title>
		<link>http://earth2tech.com/2007/11/30/un-carbon-credits-called-bogus/#comment-5280</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 15:12:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/2007/11/30/un-carbon-credits-called-bogus/#comment-5280</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hope this begins to shed light on the global warming to global redistribution of wealth scam that is going on.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Give trilllions to UN huh, cause they really know how to manage money?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The chicken litttle globalists have tried this strategy at least 3 times in the last 50 years. Once it was cooling, then cooling and warming, now warming - each time about money and liberty that we give away for the sake of the planet, but really for the sake of the con-artists.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Its a hoax folks.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;ronpaul08.com&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hope this begins to shed light on the global warming to global redistribution of wealth scam that is going on.</p>
<p>Give trilllions to UN huh, cause they really know how to manage money?</p>
<p>The chicken litttle globalists have tried this strategy at least 3 times in the last 50 years. Once it was cooling, then cooling and warming, now warming &#8211; each time about money and liberty that we give away for the sake of the planet, but really for the sake of the con-artists.</p>
<p>Its a hoax folks.</p>
<p>ronpaul08.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fate of Carbon Rests in Bali &#171; Earth2Tech</title>
		<link>http://earth2tech.com/2007/11/30/un-carbon-credits-called-bogus/#comment-4842</link>
		<dc:creator>Fate of Carbon Rests in Bali &#171; Earth2Tech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 17:50:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/2007/11/30/un-carbon-credits-called-bogus/#comment-4842</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] nations to offset their own emissions by investing in clean technologies in developing nations, came under fire last week for allegedly increasing emissions. Still, a cap-and-trade system effectively eliminated emissions [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] nations to offset their own emissions by investing in clean technologies in developing nations, came under fire last week for allegedly increasing emissions. Still, a cap-and-trade system effectively eliminated emissions [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry</title>
		<link>http://earth2tech.com/2007/11/30/un-carbon-credits-called-bogus/#comment-4723</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 06:16:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/2007/11/30/un-carbon-credits-called-bogus/#comment-4723</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah , this may be the greatest scam since the flea circus. P.T. Barnum knew to mechanize the trapeze and other parts . General Electric and the others know that the best wat to solve the problem of global warming , without public outcry , is to just be sooo nice and obedient. They already paid a truckload of cash to lobby for their solution , i.e. credts , so now they can legitimately claim that they have already saved us all. Whoa , now I can stop taking my alergy medicine because my  lungs are being saved from ai rpollution by , of all people  , corporate braintrusts.....these ideas are not sollutions. Sad.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah , this may be the greatest scam since the flea circus. P.T. Barnum knew to mechanize the trapeze and other parts . General Electric and the others know that the best wat to solve the problem of global warming , without public outcry , is to just be sooo nice and obedient. They already paid a truckload of cash to lobby for their solution , i.e. credts , so now they can legitimately claim that they have already saved us all. Whoa , now I can stop taking my alergy medicine because my  lungs are being saved from ai rpollution by , of all people  , corporate braintrusts&#8230;..these ideas are not sollutions. Sad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
