<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Commercial Solar in a &#8220;Land Grab&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://earth2tech.com/2007/12/10/commercial-solar-in-a-land-grab/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://earth2tech.com/2007/12/10/commercial-solar-in-a-land-grab/</link>
	<description>Helping the Earth with Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 21:25:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Standard Solar to Expand With $8.5M [Earth2Tech - Start-Up News] &#124; Internet Startups</title>
		<link>http://earth2tech.com/2007/12/10/commercial-solar-in-a-land-grab/#comment-18630</link>
		<dc:creator>Standard Solar to Expand With $8.5M [Earth2Tech - Start-Up News] &#124; Internet Startups</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 22:23:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/2007/12/10/commercial-solar-in-a-land-grab/#comment-18630</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] on the day that the ITC was passed, they noticed an uptick in calls about solar installations. The &#8220;land grab&#8221; for residential and commercial customers is back in [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on the day that the ITC was passed, they noticed an uptick in calls about solar installations. The &#8220;land grab&#8221; for residential and commercial customers is back in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Standard Solar to Expand With $8.5M &#171; Earth2Tech</title>
		<link>http://earth2tech.com/2007/12/10/commercial-solar-in-a-land-grab/#comment-18619</link>
		<dc:creator>Standard Solar to Expand With $8.5M &#171; Earth2Tech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 17:35:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/2007/12/10/commercial-solar-in-a-land-grab/#comment-18619</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] on the day that the ITC was passed they noticed an uptick in calls about solar installations. The &#8220;land grab&#8221; for residential and commercial customers is back in [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on the day that the ITC was passed they noticed an uptick in calls about solar installations. The &#8220;land grab&#8221; for residential and commercial customers is back in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JoJo</title>
		<link>http://earth2tech.com/2007/12/10/commercial-solar-in-a-land-grab/#comment-8830</link>
		<dc:creator>JoJo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 05:59:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/2007/12/10/commercial-solar-in-a-land-grab/#comment-8830</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;While it is reasonable to suggest that selling a solar installation to a commercial customer has a 10% margin give or take, that isn&#039;t the business that Recurrent Energy is in.  Recurrent Energy continues to own the solar they place on a roof.  Thus, their economics are those of a utility.  They invest capital at $3 per watt, and then earn a yearly return on that investment.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Near San Francisco, a watt will generate a bit more than 1.5KWh a year.  At $0.14 per kwh, which seems to be roughly what PG&amp;E would charge, you are getting a return of 7% a year on the investment.  If you can capture the time-of-use benefits, you can earn more.  If electric rates increase over time, you earn more.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While it is reasonable to suggest that selling a solar installation to a commercial customer has a 10% margin give or take, that isn&#8217;t the business that Recurrent Energy is in.  Recurrent Energy continues to own the solar they place on a roof.  Thus, their economics are those of a utility.  They invest capital at $3 per watt, and then earn a yearly return on that investment.</p>
<p>Near San Francisco, a watt will generate a bit more than 1.5KWh a year.  At $0.14 per kwh, which seems to be roughly what PG&amp;E would charge, you are getting a return of 7% a year on the investment.  If you can capture the time-of-use benefits, you can earn more.  If electric rates increase over time, you earn more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: San Francisco Wants Some Serious Solar &#171; Earth2Tech</title>
		<link>http://earth2tech.com/2007/12/10/commercial-solar-in-a-land-grab/#comment-5444</link>
		<dc:creator>San Francisco Wants Some Serious Solar &#171; Earth2Tech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 19:12:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/2007/12/10/commercial-solar-in-a-land-grab/#comment-5444</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] The new funding could finally start moving panels downstream, kicking installation companies into high gear and providing employment for hundreds of new green-collar workers. Programs like this one would also take the strain off startups that have been doing everything they can to cut costs. Energy Innovations President Andrew Beebe recently described the commercial solar sector as being in a &#8220;land grab.&#8221; [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The new funding could finally start moving panels downstream, kicking installation companies into high gear and providing employment for hundreds of new green-collar workers. Programs like this one would also take the strain off startups that have been doing everything they can to cut costs. Energy Innovations President Andrew Beebe recently described the commercial solar sector as being in a &#8220;land grab.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Morris</title>
		<link>http://earth2tech.com/2007/12/10/commercial-solar-in-a-land-grab/#comment-5243</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Morris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 20:44:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/2007/12/10/commercial-solar-in-a-land-grab/#comment-5243</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It is really interesting to watch this unfold, since there are a number of companies that have been in the solar installation market for more than a decade. They grew organically by servicing a pretty limited market. Now government incentives and venture/private equity  investment has turned it into a dog fight. What will be the major differentiator? Funding? Quality of service? Marketing/reach?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is really interesting to watch this unfold, since there are a number of companies that have been in the solar installation market for more than a decade. They grew organically by servicing a pretty limited market. Now government incentives and venture/private equity  investment has turned it into a dog fight. What will be the major differentiator? Funding? Quality of service? Marketing/reach?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
