<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Coal-Powered Ethanol: A Dirty Shade of Green</title>
	<atom:link href="http://earth2tech.com/2008/02/12/coal-powered-ethanol-a-dirty-shade-of-green/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://earth2tech.com/2008/02/12/coal-powered-ethanol-a-dirty-shade-of-green/</link>
	<description>Helping the Earth with Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 20:50:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Web</title>
		<link>http://earth2tech.com/2008/02/12/coal-powered-ethanol-a-dirty-shade-of-green/#comment-9633</link>
		<dc:creator>Web</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 22:20:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=1358#comment-9633</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Green energy is definitely the best solution in most cases.  Technology like solar energy, wind power, fuel cells, zaps electric vehicles, EV hybrids, etc have come so far recently. Green energy even costs way less than oil and gas in many cases.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Green energy is definitely the best solution in most cases.  Technology like solar energy, wind power, fuel cells, zaps electric vehicles, EV hybrids, etc have come so far recently. Green energy even costs way less than oil and gas in many cases.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Caton</title>
		<link>http://earth2tech.com/2008/02/12/coal-powered-ethanol-a-dirty-shade-of-green/#comment-8834</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Caton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 14:51:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=1358#comment-8834</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;These plants should use a combination of reflective solar and wind energy. Although the relative costs of building coal vs. reflective solar plants may make going with solar prohibitive. Reflective solar seems the best way to generate the required heat, it can be sited at the plant to reduce the need for transporting electicity, etc. Another potential downside is need for round the clock production, liquid salt might not retain enough heat to power 3 shifts.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These plants should use a combination of reflective solar and wind energy. Although the relative costs of building coal vs. reflective solar plants may make going with solar prohibitive. Reflective solar seems the best way to generate the required heat, it can be sited at the plant to reduce the need for transporting electicity, etc. Another potential downside is need for round the clock production, liquid salt might not retain enough heat to power 3 shifts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
