<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It Takes a (Russian) Rocket Scientist to Build A Wind Turbine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://earth2tech.com/2008/03/07/it-takes-a-russian-rocket-scientist-to-build-a-wind-turbine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://earth2tech.com/2008/03/07/it-takes-a-russian-rocket-scientist-to-build-a-wind-turbine/</link>
	<description>Helping the Earth with Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:29:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lefteris Pavlides</title>
		<link>http://earth2tech.com/2008/03/07/it-takes-a-russian-rocket-scientist-to-build-a-wind-turbine/#comment-18672</link>
		<dc:creator>Lefteris Pavlides</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 16:48:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=1552#comment-18672</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It is disappointing to see such nonsense.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The reason that wind energy has exploded with installations all over the world since 2000 is that in many markets wind can generate electricity less expensively than oil and natural gas. The reason that wind electricity has become so inexpensive is that power output is proportional to the square of the diameter of the rotor and also to the cube of the wind speed. Wind is much faster as one goes higher above ground in any location. Little turbines are meaningless toys at best and diversion from real wind turbines that pose a real threat to the oil and coal economy at worst.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If one understands the importance of gigantic scale for turning wind into economic electricity it becomes obvious that the blades need to move in the plane of gravity as the rotors of the brilliant design of three bladed wind turbines do. One blade would be ideal in terms of angular momentum but when scale gets huge the asymmetry causes torque. Two blades also has torque problems because when one blade is at the highest position the other is at the lowest. The differential of wind speed between the lowest and highest position in two blade wind turbines causes torque in addition to the fact that the lower blade is in wind shadow from the tower causing more torque. So three blades becomes the ideal design.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I met MIT engineers that did not understand these elemental parameters for designing wind turbines so I am not impressed that rocket scientists do not get it either.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The secret of wind energy success is scaling up the blades it is not an issue of geometry or fancy shape.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is disappointing to see such nonsense.</p>
<p>The reason that wind energy has exploded with installations all over the world since 2000 is that in many markets wind can generate electricity less expensively than oil and natural gas. The reason that wind electricity has become so inexpensive is that power output is proportional to the square of the diameter of the rotor and also to the cube of the wind speed. Wind is much faster as one goes higher above ground in any location. Little turbines are meaningless toys at best and diversion from real wind turbines that pose a real threat to the oil and coal economy at worst.</p>
<p>If one understands the importance of gigantic scale for turning wind into economic electricity it becomes obvious that the blades need to move in the plane of gravity as the rotors of the brilliant design of three bladed wind turbines do. One blade would be ideal in terms of angular momentum but when scale gets huge the asymmetry causes torque. Two blades also has torque problems because when one blade is at the highest position the other is at the lowest. The differential of wind speed between the lowest and highest position in two blade wind turbines causes torque in addition to the fact that the lower blade is in wind shadow from the tower causing more torque. So three blades becomes the ideal design.</p>
<p>I met MIT engineers that did not understand these elemental parameters for designing wind turbines so I am not impressed that rocket scientists do not get it either.</p>
<p>The secret of wind energy success is scaling up the blades it is not an issue of geometry or fancy shape.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michail</title>
		<link>http://earth2tech.com/2008/03/07/it-takes-a-russian-rocket-scientist-to-build-a-wind-turbine/#comment-13533</link>
		<dc:creator>Michail</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 16:17:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=1552#comment-13533</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;great invention, looks a lot more accessable and simpler than conventional wind turbines. Definitely a great solution for those seeking small scale alternative.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great invention, looks a lot more accessable and simpler than conventional wind turbines. Definitely a great solution for those seeking small scale alternative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web</title>
		<link>http://earth2tech.com/2008/03/07/it-takes-a-russian-rocket-scientist-to-build-a-wind-turbine/#comment-9527</link>
		<dc:creator>Web</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 20:22:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=1552#comment-9527</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Green energy is definitely the best solution in most cases.  Technology like solar energy, wind power, fuel cells, zaps electric vehicles, EV hybrids, etc have come so far recently. Green energy even costs way less than oil and gas in many cases.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Green energy is definitely the best solution in most cases.  Technology like solar energy, wind power, fuel cells, zaps electric vehicles, EV hybrids, etc have come so far recently. Green energy even costs way less than oil and gas in many cases.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: It Takes a (Russian) Rocket Scientist to Build a Wind Turbine &#124; Katie Fehrenbacher &#124; Voices &#124; AllThingsD</title>
		<link>http://earth2tech.com/2008/03/07/it-takes-a-russian-rocket-scientist-to-build-a-wind-turbine/#comment-9243</link>
		<dc:creator>It Takes a (Russian) Rocket Scientist to Build a Wind Turbine &#124; Katie Fehrenbacher &#124; Voices &#124; AllThingsD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 08:07:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=1552#comment-9243</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Read the rest of this post   Print  all_things_di220:http://voices.allthingsd.com/20080310/it-takes-a-russian-rocket-scientist-to-build-a-wind-turbine/  Sphere Comment  Tagged: Rick Halstead, wind, Katie Fehrenbacher, Earth2Tech, Voices &#124; permalink [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read the rest of this post   Print  all_things_di220:http://voices.allthingsd.com/20080310/it-takes-a-russian-rocket-scientist-to-build-a-wind-turbine/  Sphere Comment  Tagged: Rick Halstead, wind, Katie Fehrenbacher, Earth2Tech, Voices | permalink [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Earth2Tech Week in Review &#171; Earth2Tech</title>
		<link>http://earth2tech.com/2008/03/07/it-takes-a-russian-rocket-scientist-to-build-a-wind-turbine/#comment-9233</link>
		<dc:creator>Earth2Tech Week in Review &#171; Earth2Tech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 15:59:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=1552#comment-9233</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] It Takes a (Russian) Rocket Scientist to Build A Wind Turbine: From the team that brought you Russia&#8217;s sub-launched ICBMs comes something designed to save the world, not destroy it. A group of Russian engineers have designed a high-efficiency small-scale wind turbine that doesn&#8217;t require a go-code. [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It Takes a (Russian) Rocket Scientist to Build A Wind Turbine: From the team that brought you Russia&#8217;s sub-launched ICBMs comes something designed to save the world, not destroy it. A group of Russian engineers have designed a high-efficiency small-scale wind turbine that doesn&#8217;t require a go-code. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
