<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Time to Vent: Carbon Safety Valve</title>
	<atom:link href="http://earth2tech.com/2008/03/24/time-to-vent-carbon-safety-valve/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://earth2tech.com/2008/03/24/time-to-vent-carbon-safety-valve/</link>
	<description>Helping the Earth with Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:42:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Environmental Capital - WSJ.com : Green Ink: Anything But Nuclear</title>
		<link>http://earth2tech.com/2008/03/24/time-to-vent-carbon-safety-valve/#comment-9888</link>
		<dc:creator>Environmental Capital - WSJ.com : Green Ink: Anything But Nuclear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 11:46:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=1671#comment-9888</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Energy Outlook, but that will require a top-down rethink of energy policy. One policy prescription: Forget the “safety valve” on cap-and-trade schemes, argues Earth2Tech. An “ejection seat” undermines the whole point of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
