Hyperion’s Nuclear-In-A-Box Ready By 2013

Written by Katie Fehrenbacher

Hyperion Power Generation, a startup building compact nuclear power reactor units that are “about the size of a typical backyard hot tub”, says commercial deployments could start as early as 2013. The release quotes the company’s CEO John “Grizz” Deal, who says the Santa Fe, New Mexico-based startup has advanced development of its device enough to be able to reach that goal (of course the nuclear exec has such a great nickname).

The company says it initially plans to make 4,000 units — each being able to generate 70 megawatts of heat energy, or 27 megawatts of electricity from a steam turbine. That’s the equivalent power for 20,000 homes. There’s also the possibility of linking devices that could produce more power.

Hyperion’s “cartridge” reactor or “nuclear battery” is small, portable and self-contained, which could make it a good fit for remote, rural locations that are disconnected from the power grid. The company says the device can be delivered where it is needed and then sent back to the factory for refueling every five years.

The modular aspect of the device is supposed to bring down the cost of nuclear power — “30 percent” over traditional nuclear in capital costs and a 50 percent reduction in operating costs. The company says the device is also safer than traditional nuclear because: 1). it is sealed and only opened when refueled back at the factory, and 2). because it is buried at the generation site, which cuts down on tampering. We’re not sure about the company’s claims, but the image above looks slightly terrifying.

Most of the presidential candidates are touting nuclear as a promising option, and government funding has started to head that way. This is despite the significant problems with nuclear power, like issues of waste disposal, uranium supply, and safety, or the fact that it will take decades and billions of dollars to get traditional reactors built.

Private investors are also starting to eye nuclear as the country searches for answers to provide large amounts of carbon-free power. Hyperion is backed by Altira Group in an undisclosed round of funding. Toshiba reportedly has a compact modular nuclear technology in the works as well. And NRG Energy is creating Nuclear Innovation North America, a subsidiary that will develop and invest in nuclear projects, and it launched the new company with a $300 million investment from Toshiba.

 
Comments & Trackbacks

Yeah, lets just bury a nuclear reactor in the ground and let common people handle a very dangerous device. Why go through all the trouble when solar panels combined with fuel cells can provide a much cleaner and safe source of power?

Deep Patel said on August 1st, 2008 at 9:14 am

[...] Thanks for the story, Earth2Tech. [...]

i think Hyperion should do business with Iran … now we can buy nuclear bombs with a legit purpose … I cant say how Al-Qaeda will handle this reactor… they also need energy down there in dark hills.. and BTW buried inside a mountain is safer than bureid inside land… also if someone forgot to take the reactor out … man the nuclear crap will be buried all over the planet… radiations coming from everywhere … I dont want to live to see that day …

jayzee said on August 2nd, 2008 at 10:51 pm

It’s good to see this technology productized. Here’s an article on the origin of this concept from LANL from back in 2003:

http://pearl1.lanl.gov/external/Research/peterson_FLC.html

Dean said on August 4th, 2008 at 12:26 pm

@Deep Patel: because our current (in the lab now) solar technology can’t produce the amount of electricity needed now and in the near future. I hope solar efficiency continues to increase, and all the other renewable energy sources continue to grow in their use, but nuclear is necessary for now. Hyperion’s technology makes nuclear much much safer by reducing human error.

And, done right, nuclear material can be recycled.

http://www.loe.org/shows/segments.htm?programID=06-P13-00010&segmentID=1

Dean said on August 4th, 2008 at 12:34 pm

The invention per se might be compelling, but the application of it shown here has to be the most un-thought-through of all time. Has nobody read “When Things Bite Back”? The national security implications alone are staggering.

michael said on August 6th, 2008 at 10:00 am

Has the Nuclear Regulatory Agency, or the Environmental Protection Agency weighed in on this yet? I would hope they would have something to say about this boner.

chuck said on August 6th, 2008 at 10:13 am

Exactly what makes the image slightly terrifying? It looks like some people are getting much needed energy where it would not normally be available… I think it looks slightly great.

Tyler said on August 6th, 2008 at 11:39 am

Tyler, I think the technology is promising and the markets it addresses are very important. I was more thinking the marketing needs some help. With the public perceptions of the safety issues with nuclear, the company should be really careful about how it communicates itself.

Katie Fehrenbacher said on August 6th, 2008 at 12:03 pm

The beta-voltaic battery has way more potential than this thing does, and it’s safer! Check it out!

http://www.nextenergynews.com/news1/next-energy-news-betavoltaic-10.1.html

Michael said on August 6th, 2008 at 3:19 pm

[...] Read it. [...]

One of the reasons for backyard nukes is that the acreage of solar panels needed to supply the energy to produce and deliver our goods and services won’t fit in anyone’s back yard. It’s huge, in case you haven’t done the calculation. I think there will be regulatory problems, but we also have unanimous agreement from the political right, left and green that we all need to continually increase our rate of increasing everything people want (money), so ramping up the expansion of our energy sources is something everyone is going to have to figure out how to do. There just are not a lot of good options, so we’re stuck with multiplying the less good ones…

Phil Henshaw said on August 7th, 2008 at 4:02 pm

I can see the advantages. 27 MW of solar power for example destroys about 10 hectares of land, so clearly this is far more environmentally friendly.

It doesn’t solve the real problem of nuclear power though, which is that many people are irrationally scared of it.

doctorpat said on August 7th, 2008 at 7:46 pm

Actually, it’s not a backyard nuke - it’s looks to be a large electrical substation nuke, able to power a large number of homes. Two of these would supply most of the town I live in, with a very small footprint. An having the more dangerous components underground seems to be a very good choice, limiting chances of tampering.

rmark said on August 8th, 2008 at 5:00 am

[...] Katie Fehrenbacher No Comments Posted August 12th, 2008 at 8:26 am in Startups A lot of the responses to our posts on startup Hyperion Power Generation and its nuclear-in-a-box solution have questioned whether this [...]

Leave a reply
Recent Posts | Popular Posts
Recent Comments
GigaOM Network: GigaOM | WebWorkerDaily | NewTeeVee | Earth2Tech | OStatic | jkOnTheRun | Mobilize Conference | Jobs | About | Advertise | Contact
Copyright 2001–2008 Giga Omni Media, Inc. All rights reserved. Design by RareEdge RareEdge Design Group. Powered by WordPress.com. Marketing consulting by ACS.
Email This Post
  or cancel