<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Regulators Slam Duke&#8217;s Solar Funding Plan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://earth2tech.com/2009/01/06/regulators-slam-dukes-solar-funding-plan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://earth2tech.com/2009/01/06/regulators-slam-dukes-solar-funding-plan/</link>
	<description>Helping the Earth with Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 00:16:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Duke Energy Trying to Ditch Rooftop Solar &#171; Earth2Tech</title>
		<link>http://earth2tech.com/2009/01/06/regulators-slam-dukes-solar-funding-plan/#comment-24678</link>
		<dc:creator>Duke Energy Trying to Ditch Rooftop Solar &#171; Earth2Tech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 16:55:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=19287#comment-24678</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] than if it owns the photovoltaic systems itself. As a result, the regulators decided, it would be unreasonable for Duke to recoup the entire cost of the project through rate [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] than if it owns the photovoltaic systems itself. As a result, the regulators decided, it would be unreasonable for Duke to recoup the entire cost of the project through rate [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BNET Energy mobile edition</title>
		<link>http://earth2tech.com/2009/01/06/regulators-slam-dukes-solar-funding-plan/#comment-23569</link>
		<dc:creator>BNET Energy mobile edition</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 23:14:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=19287#comment-23569</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] project by increasing rates, regulators have decided. This may set a nationwide precedent. [Source: Earth2Tech] Energy-management startup raises $7.5 million -- Redwood City, Calif.-based energy-management [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] project by increasing rates, regulators have decided. This may set a nationwide precedent. [Source: Earth2Tech] Energy-management startup raises $7.5 million &#8212; Redwood City, Calif.-based energy-management [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Regulators Slam Duke’s Solar Funding Plan &#124; Novogreen</title>
		<link>http://earth2tech.com/2009/01/06/regulators-slam-dukes-solar-funding-plan/#comment-23526</link>
		<dc:creator>Regulators Slam Duke’s Solar Funding Plan &#124; Novogreen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 10:40:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=19287#comment-23526</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Read more about this here. [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read more about this here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Solar Power Update for January 6, 2009 &#171; Askthefm&#8217;s Weblog</title>
		<link>http://earth2tech.com/2009/01/06/regulators-slam-dukes-solar-funding-plan/#comment-23519</link>
		<dc:creator>Solar Power Update for January 6, 2009 &#171; Askthefm&#8217;s Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 05:49:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=19287#comment-23519</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] told no to a rate increase that was supposed to finance the plan.  The story on Earth2Tech.com (http://earth2tech.com/2009/01/06/regulators-slam-dukes-solar-funding-plan/) goes into some detail, however it isn&#8217;t looking anything but embarrassing at this [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] told no to a rate increase that was supposed to finance the plan.  The story on Earth2Tech.com (<a href="http://earth2tech.com/2009/01/06/regulators-slam-dukes-solar-funding-plan/" rel="nofollow">http://earth2tech.com/2009/01/06/regulators-slam-dukes-solar-funding-plan/</a>) goes into some detail, however it isn&#8217;t looking anything but embarrassing at this [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
