<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Realistic is Obama&#8217;s Goal to Double Clean Energy by 2012?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://earth2tech.com/2009/01/09/how-realistic-is-obamas-goal-to-double-clean-energy-output-by-2012/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://earth2tech.com/2009/01/09/how-realistic-is-obamas-goal-to-double-clean-energy-output-by-2012/</link>
	<description>Helping the Earth with Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 09:02:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: wind diesel hybrid</title>
		<link>http://earth2tech.com/2009/01/09/how-realistic-is-obamas-goal-to-double-clean-energy-output-by-2012/#comment-27294</link>
		<dc:creator>wind diesel hybrid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 02:21:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=19519#comment-27294</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;We need clean air in the future green energy are good resources that dont harm our environment..&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We need clean air in the future green energy are good resources that dont harm our environment..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wind Turbines</title>
		<link>http://earth2tech.com/2009/01/09/how-realistic-is-obamas-goal-to-double-clean-energy-output-by-2012/#comment-27203</link>
		<dc:creator>Wind Turbines</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 01:41:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=19519#comment-27203</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The president is doing his best in this matter, He is thinking about our future invironment...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The president is doing his best in this matter, He is thinking about our future invironment&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quick Federal Action Could Prevent &#8220;Raft&#8221; of Cleantech Bankruptcies: Report &#171; Earth2Tech</title>
		<link>http://earth2tech.com/2009/01/09/how-realistic-is-obamas-goal-to-double-clean-energy-output-by-2012/#comment-25946</link>
		<dc:creator>Quick Federal Action Could Prevent &#8220;Raft&#8221; of Cleantech Bankruptcies: Report &#171; Earth2Tech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 17:45:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=19519#comment-25946</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] end the credit crunch &#8212; a major obstacle for wind and solar projects &#8212; and repeated his goal of doubling the country&#8217;s clean energy output within three years. (You can read and watch the address on the White House blog.) Energy Secretary [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] end the credit crunch &#8212; a major obstacle for wind and solar projects &#8212; and repeated his goal of doubling the country&#8217;s clean energy output within three years. (You can read and watch the address on the White House blog.) Energy Secretary [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clean Power Groups Slam New Canadian Budget &#171; Earth2Tech</title>
		<link>http://earth2tech.com/2009/01/09/how-realistic-is-obamas-goal-to-double-clean-energy-output-by-2012/#comment-24590</link>
		<dc:creator>Clean Power Groups Slam New Canadian Budget &#171; Earth2Tech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 20:01:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=19519#comment-24590</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] President Barack Obama has pledged to double renewable energy in that country within three years, and a proposed $825 billion stimulus bill making its way [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] President Barack Obama has pledged to double renewable energy in that country within three years, and a proposed $825 billion stimulus bill making its way [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Proposed Stimulus Includes $54B for Energy &#171; Earth2Tech</title>
		<link>http://earth2tech.com/2009/01/09/how-realistic-is-obamas-goal-to-double-clean-energy-output-by-2012/#comment-24027</link>
		<dc:creator>Proposed Stimulus Includes $54B for Energy &#171; Earth2Tech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 16:46:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=19519#comment-24027</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Posted January 16th, 2009 at 8:46 am in Policy     President-elect Barack Obama&#8217;s pledge to double renewable energy in three years and make public buildings more energy efficient is getting a significant boost in the stimulus [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Posted January 16th, 2009 at 8:46 am in Policy     President-elect Barack Obama&#8217;s pledge to double renewable energy in three years and make public buildings more energy efficient is getting a significant boost in the stimulus [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cleantech Maverick</title>
		<link>http://earth2tech.com/2009/01/09/how-realistic-is-obamas-goal-to-double-clean-energy-output-by-2012/#comment-23793</link>
		<dc:creator>Cleantech Maverick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 20:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=19519#comment-23793</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Installed capacity is meaningless.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Installed capacity is meaningless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MDeanAcheson</title>
		<link>http://earth2tech.com/2009/01/09/how-realistic-is-obamas-goal-to-double-clean-energy-output-by-2012/#comment-23746</link>
		<dc:creator>MDeanAcheson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 21:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=19519#comment-23746</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Needed? Wanted? Within reach? A big yes to the BIG 3 renewables.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;We can only hope that in addition to political support, that funding is adequate to make it a reality. As the article mentions, this will require not only will power, but also lots of money and workers. So overall, 20 percent of energy production from renewables may be a lofty goal.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In support of the idea, if what I am reading is accurate, small solar PV systems costs should drop significantly in 2009 (lower module costs), and may even reach so-called &#039;grid parity&#039;, i.e. cost the same per kWH as utility power.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Also, in support of small solar are increased federal tax rebates of a full 30% on residential solar systems should be an incentive for homeowners (if we have any money!).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;On the other hand, utility-grade solar is hugely expensive and so depends on lots of capital and time to build out. What is emerging as the &#039;gotcha&#039; with utility-grade solar is how to get the generated power from the source (i.e. middle of nowhere) to big cities.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But perhaps the biggest holdup for solar is the need for a major power grid overhaul to handle the 1000&#039;s (millions?) of home grown and utility-sized systems.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Right now, wind and geothermal are niche players.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Wind is highly geographically concentrated and very expensive. Geothermal seems to need some technology breakthrough, and is also very costly.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;ANY one of these clean energy sources can satisfy a major portion of our country&#039;s energy needs, given enough time and money.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;To ombine renewables with better gas mileage, plus switching over to CFL lights, plus other energy saving measures, plus recycling, then we will really leverage our goal of energy independence.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So let&#039;s get with it!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Needed? Wanted? Within reach? A big yes to the BIG 3 renewables.</p>
<p>We can only hope that in addition to political support, that funding is adequate to make it a reality. As the article mentions, this will require not only will power, but also lots of money and workers. So overall, 20 percent of energy production from renewables may be a lofty goal.</p>
<p>In support of the idea, if what I am reading is accurate, small solar PV systems costs should drop significantly in 2009 (lower module costs), and may even reach so-called &#8216;grid parity&#8217;, i.e. cost the same per kWH as utility power.</p>
<p>Also, in support of small solar are increased federal tax rebates of a full 30% on residential solar systems should be an incentive for homeowners (if we have any money!).</p>
<p>On the other hand, utility-grade solar is hugely expensive and so depends on lots of capital and time to build out. What is emerging as the &#8216;gotcha&#8217; with utility-grade solar is how to get the generated power from the source (i.e. middle of nowhere) to big cities.</p>
<p>But perhaps the biggest holdup for solar is the need for a major power grid overhaul to handle the 1000&#8217;s (millions?) of home grown and utility-sized systems.</p>
<p>Right now, wind and geothermal are niche players.</p>
<p>Wind is highly geographically concentrated and very expensive. Geothermal seems to need some technology breakthrough, and is also very costly.</p>
<p>ANY one of these clean energy sources can satisfy a major portion of our country&#8217;s energy needs, given enough time and money.</p>
<p>To ombine renewables with better gas mileage, plus switching over to CFL lights, plus other energy saving measures, plus recycling, then we will really leverage our goal of energy independence.</p>
<p>So let&#8217;s get with it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
