<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SAIC Wins $25M Algae Jet Fuel Contract</title>
	<atom:link href="http://earth2tech.com/2009/01/28/saic-wins-25m-algae-jet-fuel-contract/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://earth2tech.com/2009/01/28/saic-wins-25m-algae-jet-fuel-contract/</link>
	<description>Helping the Earth with Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 15:44:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: CHEAT SHEET: Heavy Hitters in Algae Fuel Deals</title>
		<link>http://earth2tech.com/2009/01/28/saic-wins-25m-algae-jet-fuel-contract/#comment-34760</link>
		<dc:creator>CHEAT SHEET: Heavy Hitters in Algae Fuel Deals</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 04:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=21469#comment-34760</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] SAIC won a defense contract earlier this year to develop a $3-a-gallon algae-derived fuel for military jets. The funds come under a biofuels program in DARPA More » [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] SAIC won a defense contract earlier this year to develop a $3-a-gallon algae-derived fuel for military jets. The funds come under a biofuels program in DARPA More » [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: b cole</title>
		<link>http://earth2tech.com/2009/01/28/saic-wins-25m-algae-jet-fuel-contract/#comment-24926</link>
		<dc:creator>b cole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 13:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=21469#comment-24926</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;To learn more about the commercialization of the algae industry, you may want to check out this website: www.nationalalgaeassociation.com&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;They are the first algae trade association in the US.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To learn more about the commercialization of the algae industry, you may want to check out this website: <a href="http://www.nationalalgaeassociation.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.nationalalgaeassociation.com</a></p>
<p>They are the first algae trade association in the US.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josie Garthwaite</title>
		<link>http://earth2tech.com/2009/01/28/saic-wins-25m-algae-jet-fuel-contract/#comment-24600</link>
		<dc:creator>Josie Garthwaite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 23:32:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=21469#comment-24600</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@Max - The $6B for 71M barrels figure is from 2006, and $3 per gallon would be a stepping stone to $1 per gallon.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Max &#8211; The $6B for 71M barrels figure is from 2006, and $3 per gallon would be a stepping stone to $1 per gallon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max</title>
		<link>http://earth2tech.com/2009/01/28/saic-wins-25m-algae-jet-fuel-contract/#comment-24599</link>
		<dc:creator>Max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 23:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2tech.com/?p=21469#comment-24599</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Is that spending number right?  $6 Billion for 71 Million barrels (@42 gallons/barrel) gives $2/gal (or $84/barrel).  That&#039;s pretty good given how high prices spiked in 2008.  Why would they want SAIC to develop a $3/gal algae fuel if they&#039;re paying $2/gal now?  I can understand if they expect it to increase in the future or do not want to use a foreign-controlled fuel source (the military is active in getting off of petroleum fuel products).  But why would they make the award to produce a $3/gal fuel product?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Strange.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is that spending number right?  $6 Billion for 71 Million barrels (@42 gallons/barrel) gives $2/gal (or $84/barrel).  That&#8217;s pretty good given how high prices spiked in 2008.  Why would they want SAIC to develop a $3/gal algae fuel if they&#8217;re paying $2/gal now?  I can understand if they expect it to increase in the future or do not want to use a foreign-controlled fuel source (the military is active in getting off of petroleum fuel products).  But why would they make the award to produce a $3/gal fuel product?</p>
<p>Strange.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
