Wi-Fi Alliance: 7 Reasons Wi-Fi Will Succeed in the Smart Grid

My article 5 Reasons Wi-Fi Will Take a Back Seat for the Smart Grid stirred up a lot of debate in wireless circles — while some agreed with it and some pointed out reasons they felt I’d overlooked, others flat-out disagreed with what I wrote. Among them was the Wi-Fi Alliance, the trade group whose white paper I cited in the story. To that end, Greg Ennis, Wi-Fi Alliance’s technical director, presented me with the group’s own list of reasons why, as he put it, “Wi-Fi will succeed for smart grid deployments.” They are:

1. Huge installed base: An estimated 2 billion Wi-Fi chipsets have shipped as of this year. One of every 10 people in the world uses Wi-Fi for work and leisure.

2. Economies of scale: Like many semiconductor-based technologies, the growth in the market for Wi-Fi chipsets has driven increasing volumes and generated lower prices. This year more than 500 million Wi-Fi chipsets will ship and one billion units are expected to ship in 2011.

3. Carriers already deploy it: Worldwide, all major mobile carriers offer WiFi-enabled handsets. Wi-Fi provides the multimedia-rich experience that subscribers want while conserving expensive spectrum. An estimated 80 million WiFi-enabled handsets shipped in 2008; that number is expected to grow to 300 million in 2011.

4. Residential customers love and trust it, and want their smart energy applications to use it: Consumers enjoy the freedom and convenience of Wi-Fi in an impressive array of devices ranging from computers to mobile handsets and a growing range of consumer electronics.

5. Established certification ecosystem and mature industry: The Wi-Fi CERTIFIED designation has been awarded to more than 6,000 devices. The program is recognized as a designator of quality by consumers and across the technology industry. Testing is conducted in 13 authorized test labs around the world.

6. Innovation in low-power silicon: Several new low-power Wi-Fi chipsets are capable of working in very low-power systems. When integrated into a device that optimizes use of the Wi-Fi radio, these chipsets support battery life of up to 10 years in end points such as utility meters.

7. Innovation in distance networking: Existing city-wide Wi-Fi networks include systems that provide access covering up to 500 meters from the AP, interconnected by point-to-point links based on 802.11 technology and using proprietary mesh protocols. Wi-Fi can be used for both neighborhood network access and as part of a wide area network (WAN) backhaul system.

 

Comments (1)

  • Hi

    Below is a comparison of Wi-Fi and Zigbee on various metrics that should be useful:

    1: Technology Penetration into Home Products – 2009 (USA)
    Wi-Fi: >35% Zigbee: <1%

    2: “Number of Certified Products (2009 October)
    Source: Wi-Fi Forum Website and Zigbee Forum Website”
    Wi-Fi: 6356 Zigbee: <30

    3: Band (most used)
    Wi-Fi: 2.4-2.5GHz Zigbee: 2.4-2.5GHz

    4: Effective Bandwidth / Channel Spacing (most used)
    Wi-Fi: 20MHz / 25MHz Zigbee: 3MHz / 5MHz

    5: Tolerance of Interference:
    Wi-Fi: Good. Wider-bandwidth Spreadspectrum Zigbee: Bad. Narrower-bandwidth Spreadspectrum

    6: Tolerance of Multipath – RMS Delay spreads (Implementation dependent)
    Wi-Fi: “150ns RMS @ 54Mbps, 500ns RMS @ 1Mbps” Zigbee: 500ns RMS @ 250kbps

    7: MAC/PHY Security:
    Wi-Fi: WPA/WPA2/CCX are Industry Tested Zigbee: MAC layer security Not available. Relies on Higher layer Security

    8: Cost Of solutions:
    Wi-Fi: Steadily reducing over years. Single-antenna, Zero-Host, Wi-Fi Chipsets are available today for ~$5 & self-contained modules for ~$10 (including TCP/IP)
    Wi-Fi modules inside today’s mobile phones come for less than $4.5 (refer to teardowns e.g,. from isuppli for publicly available information.

    Zigbee: Not known

    9: Number of Vendors
    Wi-Fi: Many Zigbee: Few

    10: Data-rate (Max/Typ/Min)
    Wi-Fi (b/g): 54Mbps / 36Mbps / 1Mbps
    Zigbee: 250kbps alone (Ref: 802.15.4-2006 Section 6.5)

    11: Receiver Sensitivity (at Max/Typ/Min data-rates) – Implementation dependent
    Wi-Fi (54/36 and 1Mbps) -75dBm / -81dBm / -98dBm
    Zigbee (250Kbps) -98dBm

    12: Max Packet Length supported
    Wi-Fi: 4KBytes (b/g), 64KBytes (n) Zigbee: 127 bytes

    13: IP Layer can be directly ported over the MAC?
    Wi-Fi: Yes Zigbee: Needs additional layer – 6LowPAN

    14: Peak Rx Current @ 3.3V (min/max values for typical implementations in the market)
    Wi-Fi: 100 – 200mA Zigbee: 60 – 100mA

    15: Peak Tx Current @ 3.3V for 20dBm Tx Power (min/max values for typical implementations in the market)
    Wi-Fi: 250 – 350mA Zigbee: 250 – 350mA

    16: Shutdown current (min/max values for typical low-power implementations available today)
    Wi-Fi: 1 – 5uA Zigbee: 1 – 5uA

    17: Energy Efficiency of Reception @ highest datarate (using max values for current consumption)
    Wi-Fi: 15nJ / bit Zigbee: 1320nJ/bit

    18: Energy Efficiency of Reception @ lowest datarate (using max values for current consumption)
    Wi-Fi: 825nJ / bit Zigbee: 1320nJ/bit

    19: Does the PHY have error correction coding
    Wi-Fi: Yes Zigbee: No

    20: Certification for Peer to Peer Low-power operation available?
    Wi-Fi: “Yes(Wi-Fi Direct)” Zigbee: Yes

    Hope this is useful

    Thanks
    Partha

    Partha5:15 PM on November 30, 2009 Reply

Linkbacks (0)

Subscribe to comments feed

Leave a Reply

Sign up for our daily email:

© 2010 The GigaOM Network. Marketing consulting by ACS. Design by RareEdge Design Group.

Email This Post
  or cancel