Almost anyone would agree with the goal of Portland, Ore., startup GreenPrint: end wasteful printing. But as The New York Times points out in a profile this weekend on the company, which makes software to reduce unnecessary pages in a printing cycle, working out the business model and technical hurdles to sell a product that supports this goal is difficult. After four years of development, GreenPrint’s consumer-facing free software is being actively used on a daily basis by only around 25,000 people. The Times says companies have been reluctant to buy the startup’s corporate version “until GreenPrint worked out a host of technical issues,” like the fact that when the software encountered big documents it really slowed down the printing process.
But in addition to technical issues bogging down the plan, the business model actually leaves a lot to be desired. GreenPrint offers a free downloadable consumer version, a premium $30 consumer product, and a version for corporations that costs $70 per user. Free downloads from a company’s web site are generally a very difficult way to bring in revenues. GreenPrint is trying to bring in revenue by selling ads on the free version, but I can’t picture too many advertisers lining up for that. In addition, it can be hard to convince customers using something for free to upgrade to a $30 premium version.
Are you ready to give Microsoft’s 
We give a lot of props to the entrepreneurs, innovators, engineers and investors that are building the greentech tools of tomorrow. But we don’t often offer a lot of praise for the legislative process or the policy makers that have been driving clean energy and climate policy (OK, except
Updated: More than any utility on the planet,
In the past couple of weeks startups and infotech giants have been
The fact that former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, now a Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institution, isn’t a big fan of the current energy bill that 
