When it comes to the smart grid, utility executives seem willing to embrace the dumb pipe status that their cousins in the telecommunications world are so leery of. That’s because the history of heavy regulation — and near-monopoly — has created an environment where competition and innovation aren’t commonly baked into the utility business model. At a panel discussion held at the Clean Energy Venture Summit in Austin, Texas today, utility executives debated the idea of whether utilities should focus on adding value-added services on top of the power network (like phone companies have rushed to do on their data networks) or if utilities should remain content to provide the basic energy pipes.
Mark Rose, general manager and CEO of Bluebonnet Electric Cooperative, was perhaps the most vocal on the subject, saying that he believes a utility’s role was to provide a service, and an open platform upon which consumers and businesses can track their energy from end to end in whatever way they want. But when it came to providing new applications and services that could be built on top of that service, he questioned if the utility was the right entity to provide that.
The venture capital panel at today’s at the Green:Net conference here in San Francisco was a mess of contradictions. The panelists debated the role of government in cleantech before finally coming to the conclusion that while government will have to play a role in their cleantech investments, it would be stupid to rely on t for subsidies that would unsustainably boost a business model. “Subsidies are good, they are like icing on the cake, but businesses need to have real economic models,” says Navin Chaddha managing director of Mayfield.
If a company wants to improve energy efficiency, it needs to think about how it can affect its products and its suppliers rather than merely what it can do internally, says Rob Bernard, Chief Environmental Strategist at Microsoft speaking today at the Green:Net Conference in San Francisco. “We have a massive problem and a massive challenge and a massive opportunity,” said Bernard.
Data center operators at various large companies talked at the GreenNet conference today in San Francisco about how they’re making their data centers more energy efficient. It boils down to metrics, utilization and awareness. But first they outlined the problem: Kenneth Brill, executive director of the Uptime Institute, explains how computers are primarily in these vast over air-conditioned rooms filled with computers running all the time, blowing hot air. Historically, the computer industry never paid attention to the power consumption of its servers and data centers, but now that is changing.
Jonathan Koomey, project scientist and professor with Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and Stanford University called for data center operators to focus on the overall costs of their computing in terms of finances and energy today at the Green:Net conference in San Francisco. He offers cloud computing as a way to cut those costs and realign incentives around reducing the total cost of ownership of a data center. He said the cloud is responsible for 1-2 percent of today’s global electricity use, but it’s also driving productivity higher while being more energy efficient.
Bob Metcalfe, general partner with Polaris Ventures and the inventor of Ethernet, got on stage today at the Green:Net conference in San Francisco to call for “a squanderable abundance of cheap and clean energy,” that will crib from the development of the Internet.
Among his points:

